The 32-bit WHEEL-632 and SUPER-632 lotto wheeling software available as freeware. Generate lotto wheels from 3 of 6 to 6 of 6 using powerful filters and reports.
For Min-FIVE lotto filter you always use "Total number of drawings". You NEVER use MAX-FIVE; it can be as high as hundreds of thousands of lotto drawings! So disregard MAX-FIVE altogether. You have so many more lottery filters to work with...
The 'maximum' value of a lottery filter is equivalent to 'no more than but not equal to'. If we choose " Max_Two-1" = 3, we'll be correct if "Two-1" was no more than 2. Pay special attention to this: the 'maximum' must be at least 'the minimum plus 1'.
Set up the lotto software as suggested and used D6 for these results. My game is a 49/6 lotto with 1 bonus ball. 7 drawn in total. I would really appreciate some pointers in this regard.
Read thoroughly the tutorials that come with the two software packages. I can't afford to write the same thing again and again. Also, some 99 in 100 users will get irritated if I write a single line on the trivial task of creating the data files for my lottery software! Nobody should spend more than five minutes on learning how to create and maintain the lottery data files.
I opened the floodgates! I uploaded the most powerful lotto-5 and lotto-6 software you can imagine at this time. One caveat: There is NO documentation, I have no documentation whatsoever. But don't worry: Trust your intelligence and creativity!
Downloaded the progran and played with it over the weekend. Have read and reread the tutorials for Freeware Lotto v8.0 and cannot understand the use of the Any and Ver filters. A more in depth explanation may get it into my pea brain! For last nights Fantasy 5 (GA Lottery) I ran 3 optimized lotto 5 files.
There are some who always wanted me to disappear. It's easy to figure out who they are: they are casino-affiliated or involved in the lottery business (software, systems, scams). They only represent a negligible minority -- but they are very vocal at times!
I forgot to mention a third category of people who want me to discontinue my software and systems. These are USERS of my software and systems. A most faithful user of my lottery and horseracing software exemplifies this best. In a way, I consider him a collaborator. He put it sincerely a few years ago : You made the wisest decision when you stopped selling your software.
The fundamental formula of gambling is the only winning method in casino gambling. No gambling system developer dares to challenge Ion Saliu in a real casino.
Paste your column data into a statistical analysis program like MS Excel, minitab, SAS or SPSS. Then do a "sort cases" either ascending or descending, as you prefer.
I updated also UPDOWN.EXE and SHUFFLE.EXE. The porting to 32-bit was not error-free. The error trapping is better. The programs can handle now large files, up to the 32-bit limits. SUMS.EXE, the sum-total lottery program has been greatly improved. It handles now: pick-3, pick-4, lotto-5, lotto-6, lotto-7, Powerball, Mega Millions, Euromillions. The lotto software has a fast option: only calculates the amount of lotto combinations that add-up to a sum-total.
My WHEEL-49.36 was created by a lotto system-generating engine. The engine insured that each and every 3-number group in the 49-number lotto field was covered at least once. Generating random lottery combinations DOES NOT assure that each and every 3-number group will be generated. As stated, WHEEL49.36 contains all the 3-number lotto groups in a 49-number field.
Debating requires some hostility in order to advance. I had a philosophy professor in college, Jewish by background; my high school philosophy teacher was Greek (a Socratic, but also a communist refugee). They said something similar, although I don't remember their statements ad literam. "A monologue does not make a bridge necessary. It takes a dialogue (two different points of view) to make a bridge necessary and build it."
The number 1, #1 online lottery, lotto, loto, loterie, loteria numbers, numeros, numere, gambling, roulette, keno, sports, horseracing, random number combinations, trifecta, exacta generator.
The software programs in the third group generate an unusual type of lottery combinations. I called them "shuffled". The programs "shuffle" all the numbers in a lotto game like a deck of cards. If the lotto game has 48 numbers, the lotto software will generate groups of 6 lotto numbers per combination, 8 combinations per group.
I surfed through on your message board. Let me first say that I have never seen Casino Royale, but it sounds as though a certain elusive Richard Graham, aka many other names, may have used it as a basis for his Goldmine Roulette!
I already know a guy nick-named "Wizard of Odds". His nickname is valid only insofar as related to mysticism. I think his correct nickname should be "Lizard of Odds": His odds-related knowledge belongs to the dinosaurs' era!
Mike Shakelford is one of the foremost experts in system study and evaluation. He is hired by THE CASINOS to research and verify the statistical probabilities of games of chance. Defeat the Wizard, get your money back, and get worldwide acclaim.
I saw that in the banner ad the was on the USA Today lottery results page and also that there was just a minor note about having to pick ONE pick-3 digit for Steve Player's system to work, but as any one who plays pick three knows the one digit can be very hard to do.
I understand Chip sold his roulette system for around $5,000 (FIVE THOUSAND US DOLLARS). My roulette strategy consisted of more than a dozen gambling systems. I sold the entire package for $50 (FIFTY US DOLLARS)! Can you believe this? I can't! How can one be afraid of testing his $5,000 roulette system against a $50 gambling system?
As of "Wizard of Odds" "theory", just one fact will be more than relevant. The "Wizard of Odds" adamantly sustains that "getting 200 heads in a row is equal to getting one (1) head in a row"! That's it and that's that! I asked him to provide me with a real-life sample of 200 heads in a row. Embarrassed and angry, he replied with something like "maybe 20 heads in a row is MORE EQUAL to 1 head in a row"...
Why didn't you put "Don't gamble, you never win!" as the headline of your famous "New York Times" advertisement for roulette systems??? Secondly, after making the case on "gambler's fallacy", how can you still claim you are ahead $20,000 at baccarat???
Validate tens of millions of roulette spins?!? Do you live that long? Can anybody play tens of millions of spins uninterrupted? Why shouldn't you validate a gambling system in humanly possible measures? Validation is winning over sanely shorter period of times: 100-200 roulette spins a day, several days a week, several weeks a month, several months a year. That's how normal humans play.
The "message" of your post can be summarized as: "Don't gamble, you never win!" You even invoke prestigious entities in this regard: Encyclopedia Britannica and Albert Einstein. By the way, Einstein did propose tongue in cheek a "roulette system": Double up after each loss! See how ridiculous even a genius can be sometimes, especially when it's none of his business? As a rule of thumb, you should always question everything, regardless who the author is.
Going further back to the Wizard of Odds, below is a recent mailing I had with him ... 'Wizard of Odds': "I didn't know they adjusted the frets but the casinos in general like to always be using new equipment and checking everything to make sure they are playing a fair game. In other words it is just a precaution against their roulette wheels become so worn they become biased."
You fabricate things, like your story with a roulette system and New York Times. Here are two passages from your posts that back my opinion on you. "I have no idea of anyone's name from the Times as it was quite long ago. When the ad was being deliberated, they sent represntatives on 2 separate trips we made to Atlantic City. I can only tell you that they were satisfied and accepted the ad..." What a fabrication! The prestigious "New York Times" sending representatives to the Atlantic City casinos!
I have read through the mathmatical justifications for the Lotto systems posted here and can't say I understand them completely. The thing that I really don't get is - what difference does it make what happened in past lotto drawings? Statistics theory as I learned it says that in an honest game every lottery combination has equal probability.
I did another seach for helping me in the lotto (6/49) and came across your web site. After reading a bit of the background I downloaded the program and are now pleased to report that I have won in both the following lottery drawings with an average of 6 combinations of 4 out of 6 and in the last lotto drawing even a 5 out of 6 combination.
What you have said about equal probability is correct but that is only for each number. When you look at the combination as a whole it is anither story. A lotto combination of say 1 2 3 4 5 6 as a whole does not have such a high probability due to the fact that they are in seqence. If you close your eyes and randomly throw stones at 49 bottles it will very seldom if ever happen that you will hit 6 bottles that are next to each other.
Probability is an abstract concept. Real events incorporate probability in complex laws. Equal probability combinations have different degrees of certainty and frequencies.
If you don't like using 1,2,3,4,5,6 then go to a site that generates random numbers like randomizer.org. A random set of numbers you generate there has just as much probability of occurring as anything you can generate using past results.
I want to thank you and all the other players who play those lotto numbers as your money helps build the jackpot with out me having to worry about you winning the lottery before me.
Excellent job ! (like always). have noted that SUPER-6.EXE is working only if the Data file has more that 6000 lotto gs. Maybe that happened only in my case, but in any way since I am playing 6-90 Lotto do you think that data file of 6000 drawings should be OK.
As much as I bashed that delusional individual who signed as "Chip", well, well… One of his statements makes more sense to me now: "...in 2 posts I have given you the road to 1) put the casinos out of business and 2) make you the superstar of mathematical certainty. And imagine the adulation you will receive for offering "dozens" of gambling systems for $50.
Use UTIL-6.EXE lotto software, then Simulate data and generate 7000 lotto drawings. Then combine your Data-6 file with SIM-6: COPY DATA-6+SIM-6 D6. Now you won't worry about incorrect lottery data files anymore.
Total combinations for the 6/45 lotto game: C(45 taken 6 at a time) = 8,145,060. Total combinations of 20 lotto numbers taken 6 at a time: C(20, 6) = 38,760. The probability to get the 6 lotto winners in the 20-number bloc: 38,760 / 8,145,060 = 0.48% (less than half a percentage point). You can expect 6 winners once in 200+ lottery drawings.
This is the most divisive issue in theory of gambling. Does the past matter or not in random events? Isn't the probability of getting "Heads" always ˝ or 50%? Yes, it is. At the same time, it is true that the probability to get 100 "Heads" in a row is much, much lower than tossing one "Heads" only.
In the Philippines, there is no pick 3 lottery, but the result is like pick 3. Result is determined by unscropulous (spelling OK?) businessmen. The result is dependent on the amount of bets. The result is determined by humans, you like it or not, though they say it is not.. The Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG) remains Okay and the results follow your theory.
Of course, I am curious to see how you use neural networking. There are many searches on Attrasoft at my site. Some suggest the software tries to imitate my lottery approach. Is it piracy of my theory?
The median is the most reliable when used with the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG). It is similar to coin tossing. Half of any filter values are under the median, the other half above the median. The FFG column is p = 1/2. If a filter was under the median 2 times in a row, the chance is over 75% that it will be above the median the next drawing.
YOUR systems and lotto software programs sound ntresting, but DOS doesnt work on the Macintosh systems. Is there any chance the lottery systems and programs might be or become accessible on Apple's Mac?
The Fundamental Formula of Gambling has a solid mathematical and theory of probability basis. It's an undeniable logarithmic relation started by Abraham de Moivre.
There is a significant number of Internet searches related to: fluctuation, variability, variation, or standard deviation in random phenomena. This search category brings a sizable number of visitors to this site. I state elsewhere at this website that everything is random. Only randomness is Almighty. All events are random; the difference lies in different degrees of randomness.
I keep an eye on the statistics for the Ohio Lottery but they changed from a pool of 47 numbers to one of 49 in July of this year. I had a large history for the Ohio Lottery and was wondering if I can only use the newer drawings where the drawings were from the 49 numbers or if I should use the whole history?
Show us a little detail to convince us that you are not a scammer. Some math will do best. You don't have to detail your system. In my case, I made public, for free, a roulette system that does win and it is based on math. But that does not tell a thing about my real roulette strategy.
Going back to your FFG, you said that "12-number spin will only encounter MORE than 18 LOSING spins only in one 1000 spin-runs." But a check at the analysis at "WWW.WIN-MAXX.COM" spins section yielded several incidents (more than 3, at least) of 18 or more SLEEPING dozen/column on July 1-7, 2000 Spielbank Hamburg, of 2232 spins.
I would like to congratulate you for the freeware program (MDIEditor and Lotto Ver. 8.00) you provided. I have used the lottery software for the Australian Tattslotto 6/45 for about 5 times and I won the 2nd Division prize today (Sat 25/8/2001)! And it happened to be on the same day we put down our deposit for a piece of land - unbelievable! Once again thank you and please let us know how we can support your web site etc.
On one hand, we hear strongly negative opinions on the probability of winning consistently at the horse tracks. Summarize: the bettor will lose no matter what gambling or betting system he/she uses. Nobody can predict the finisher, let alone the top three finishers, unless the race is fixed, or rigged, or mob-controlled! On the other hand, there are hilariously positive opinions and systems to win at horseracing! "100% guaranteed to win any horse race in the world!"