Comments:
: : Wonder grid: best lotto strategy system software. I know your lotto software is free and I can do by myself but you are expert on it and I have no practice with it. Only one problem with your method: if many players adopt it they will be concurrent because they are playing the same lotto wheels and the jackpot will be divided or the second prize. The 'lottery wonder-strategy' has absolutely nothing to do with Mr. Z, or Mr. T, or Mr. Misterfield. I need to answer one more question regarding the 'lotto magical grid'. When is it best to do the pairing report? Do it starting at the most recent draw and use the BEST6 lotto file from that point on for a number of (future) drawings? Yes, that's an option. But you can also go back a number of drawings in the data file and work with those reports and "wheel" files. You have a DATA-6 (exactly 6 lotto numbers per line, real drawings). You can delete a number of N/2 (the biggest lotto number divided by 2) lines. Save the file under a new name: DATA-6.2. Run the frequency report (F in UTIL-6). Create a 'best pairing' file WHEEL6.2. Open DATA-6 again and now delete the top N drawings. Save the file as DATA-6.N. Repeat the step above; save 'best pairings' as WHEEL6.N. You can check now all WHEEL6 files against DATA-6 and/or against future drawings. One of them will yield the best results. In any event, the 'wonder-grid' yields far better results than any other wheel, even 3-4 times larger. "Thank you Ion for the new UTIL-6. It's a little ironic that you send it to me now. I just created a file (before checking my e-mail) using all of the lotto balls in the Illinois lottery, and pairing each one up with the 5 numbers that hit the most with each ball. I then checked it for winners, and had similar results to yours. LotWon does not cover PowerBall to the same extent as lotto-6. Powerball was of no interest to me, because it's not offered by PA lottery. You may try to use powerball-6 the same way as lotto-6. Treat the powerpall as the 6th lotto number. You can see what results UTIL-6 gives you. In most cases, the powerball is not equal to any of the 5 regular numbers. What is the best way to report the pair frequency? Pair the five regular lotto numbers only? Or throw the powerball in the mix as well? The formula is also validated by real lottery drawings. I haven't heard of any report to the contrary, in any lottery. I am convinced now FFG will not be contradicted in this regard, ever.<Br> : Let's take the lotto 6/49 game, the most common worldwide. The median is 6 (use my freeware FORMULA.EXE to do the calculations for a 50% degree of certainty). We need software to plot the skips for each lotto number. A skip shows how many drawings a number waits between hits. My freeware "MDIEditor and Lotto" and UTIL-6.EXE do the best job at charting the lotto skips. The second part of the lottery strategy is newer in my research. It is based on the pairings of the lotto numbers. Given a range of drawings, each lotto number shows a clear bias towards being drawn with the rest of the lotto numbers. The newest version of my freeware UTIL-6.EXE calculates the frequencies of all lotto pairings for every lotto number. The 25% segment of the most frequent pairs account for 50% of the entire pairing frequency for any given lotto number. : The "top 50%" of the lottery pairings represents 75% of total frequencies for each number. That is, the first half of the pairs (from left to right) accounts for 75% of the entire pairing frequency for any given lotto number. : Again, I repeat the very important point here. My analysis of the lotto pairings is not as thorough as other domains of my gambling mathematics. But this is an open debate and we should be able to find the fault, if it exists. So, I assume that the pairing percentages above hold true for any lotto game, at any given point in a lotto history. : Curiously, this strategy does NOT work with static lotto wheels. Instead of playing all possible combinations of 5, we may think of wheeling the 12 most frequent pairs. Let's say the best '3 of 5' 12-number static wheel amounts to 6 combinations. 24 x 6 = 144 combinations, while the 3rd prize is lower than $144. Even playing a 4-combination '3 of 5' wheel makes no sense at all. 24 x 4 = 96, probably still below the prize! One more reason why playing static lotto wheels is a no-no. See also my post on this message board: "The myths of lottery: frequency and systems". : There is another category. There are those who don't want to make their "killer' strategies public. I have received several requests to take a look at or try to improve lottery or gambling systems.